Sousa Scorecard

The following scorecard is for sousa_2-5-x-1 released on July 16, 2008. All evaluations were done by Mark Norton, the project leader of the Sousa Project.

The following evaluation methods are proposed for the scorecard items selected in the Scorecard BOF at the Ninth Sakai Conference in Paris, France. Please feel free to edit in place, add comments in other colors, or append comments below.

Note that point scales for individual items vary considerably. This is not a problem if we develop a weighting schemes when scores are rolled up into the four evaluation dimensions.

See also Scorecard Item Definitions

No. Scorecard Item Max Points Score Comments
1.0 User Experience 60 16 26%
1.1 Consistency / Best practices 10 5 Some conventions are used. Sakai CSS.
1.2 Usability 10 5 Improvements are needed.
1.3 Accessibility 10 2 No formal assessment. Basic support included.
1.4 Internationalization 20 2 Only one langauge (English)
1.5 Ease of use 0    
1.6 User testing 10 2 Very limited user testing, informal feedback.
2.0 Technical 148 23 15%
2.1 Browser support 6 3 FF2, FF3, IE6
2.2 Code review 10 0 No formal code review yet.
2.3 Unit testing 10 0 No test, no results.
2.4 Functional regression testing 10 0 No test, no results.
2.5 Integration testing 10 0 No tests, no results.
2.6 Performance testing 10 0 No test, no results.
2.7 Internationalization 10 5 Strings externalized. UTF-8 support.
2.8 Licensing 10 5 Currently on a personal license, not Sakai.
2.9 Outstanding JIRA bugs 10 0 Not part of Jira yet.
2.10 Packaging (code structure) 10 8 Conforms to naming conventions. Maven 1/2 support.
2.11 Static code review 10 0 No tests, no results.
2.12 Validation/spec conformance 10 0 No test, no results.
2.13 DB support 10 n/a Based on CHS, no databases.
2.14 DB best practices 10 n/a Bsed on CHS, no databases.
2.15 Security review 10 2 Check for basic permissions.
2.16 Technical 0    
2.17 Event tracking 2 0 No support for event tracking.
3.0 Descriptive 48 29 60%
3.1 Bundled Help 10 0 No bundled help.
3.2 Test plan 10 6 Test plan exists, needs work.
3.3 Javadocs 10 9 Very good coverage.
3.4 Design Documentation 3 9 Well documented.
3.5 Wiki/website 0    
3.6 Deployment doc 3 2 Exists, needs work.
3.7 End user external docs. 3 3 Good documentation.
3.8 Issue Tracking (Jira) 3 0 Not included in Jira at this time.
3.9 Events documented 3 0 No support for events.
3.10 Licensing Documented 0    
3.11 Configuration 3 1 No configuration properties at this time.
4.0 Community Support 47 16 34%
4.1 Team size 20 1  
4.2 Team diversity 4 1  
4.3 Responsiveness 10 5 I do what I can.
4.4 Production experience 3 1 Still new after one year of development.
4.5 Communications and openness. 10 8 YMMV.
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.