Faulty Engagement Group Discussion:
- Discipline or Tool specific works best
- Look across tools and disciplines to find common ground
- Educause Learning Initiative might be a good outlet for this
- Faculty must have a value proposition to get involved
- tenure and promotion->not likely
- personal responsibility
- improve teaching portfolio
- Action items
- merge with support group and exemplars (all interrelated)
- peer-reviewed teaching and learning track at conferences
- fund some faculty to participate in Sakai?
- have Sakai members present at discipline specific conference?
- all links back to tenure and promotion
- instructional designers act as proxies in posting to pedagogy list in Confluence
- What do faculty contribute to the Sakai community? What is the role of the faculty member in Sakai?
- perhaps to help Sakai understand its mission?
- Are we moving to a Sakai community 2.0 as an open source model for knowledge and practices too?
- Evidence-based practice-->Faculty believe peers and best practices by peers
- Imagine various Sakai sessions at Educause
- Work more with ELI
- Work more with ELI