| < Previous Conference Call | Next Conference Call > |
Agenda Items
I. T&L Repository Branding/Naming
1. Follow-up (Nate)
- Must rebrand the library.
- Link from the home page of our group.
- People are invited to jump in.
- Doesn't have to be sexy.
- Must include stuff outside Sakai.
- OSP, User Doc, T&L have to be consulted.
- Marist grad student is hired.
II. Award
1. Name of the Award (Matt)
- 1) The __ Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award _or 2) The Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award, sponsored by ____
- until all sponsors are set, let's start with the second idea.
- Do we need to narrow it down? Yes.
- Levels: have other sponsors give away lesser prizes.
- Some sponsors might not like being in the shadow of IBM.
- Must follow-up on SG.
2. Steps and deadlines (Janet) - NOT DISCUSSED IN DETAIL DURiNG THE CALL
| Step | Begin Date | End Date | Who's in Charge? | Progress | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubrics | Next week. | 80% | Maggie made the first draft. Almost done now. | ||
| Application Process | |||||
| Promotion | Get IBM to set up a promotional page. | ||||
| Judge Selection | Down to 6 judges. Who should be contacted? | ||||
| Short List | |||||
| Judging | |||||
| Heads-up to the Winner | |||||
| Announcement | July 1, 2008. | July 3, 2008 | At the Paris Conference. |
3. Rubrics (Janet, Maggie, Matt)
Maggie, Janet, Matt and Salwa (and others likely) have created a DRAFT Rubric for us to review today. (version with revisions)
- 7 principles: citation + graduate too.
- Provide a link to the 7 principles.
- Course look and feel. Accessibility has been taken out.
- Put accessibility in the Excelent.
- Learner support. Add "if needed" to on the fly support.
- Link to a glossary. Start in Confluence. Post it on a web site afterwards (post to OSP Library).
- Use the conference page?
- Post to the mailing list.
- Maggie will be in charge of working on the rubric. Work needed in the visual design.
- Start with the Innovative column. Find a way to weight it.
- Innovation is difficult to assess. Innovation is difficult to assess.
- Add a Not Effective. need Add a Not Effective (need some work). Leave the innovation out of the rubric. Complete the spectrum.
- Needs Improvement.
- Scoring would be the filter.
4. Follow-up on the Judges (Josh)
- Positive feedback from the board.
- No concern from the board on our short list.
- Two other suggestions. Josh will try to get in touch with John.
- Two from Europe from Michael.
- How many judges?
- Sample letter (Matt and Josh).
5. Application process (Eddie, Josh, Nate)
- Conference proposal OR Drupal.
- CP not Open source. Must be customized.
- Nate, Eddie and Josh will talk offline.
